|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carriage traverse handwheel of the correct "balanced" kind.. An over-engineered but pleasingly designed screw-in boss provided the handwheel-spindle support. The location of the saddle against the top of the rack can be clearly seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The top of the cross slide was provided with an inverted conical section slot into which a matching section on the base of the top slide fitted. A single square-headed bolt pushed a bronze locking plate into place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The degree graduations for the top-slide swivel were engraved so that, once out of the central position, the zero mark met then at an awkward angle. The number stampings were at inconveniently-wide 30 degree intervals - which would have involved the operator in lots of time-wasting counting to arrive at the intended setting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although the base of the headstock was heavily built, the amount of material surrounding the all-important spindle bearings was inadequate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The small-diameter spindle, long, bronze bearing (and a lack of supporting metal surrounding them) were typical of Victorian thinking - later designs would take another direction with more massive and rigid headstocks, large-diameter spindles and much shorter bearings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barnes tailstocks appear to differ little in design from model to model. This example had a top which could be off set for taper turning, the bed clamp was at the side, secured with a single nut, whilst the No. 2 Morse taper barrel was clamped by closing up a slit in the casting. The handwheel, though of a respectable diameter, was bereft of a handle, which would have made withdrawing a long drill a tedious experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|